Call me a spoilsport, but I didn’t really enjoy the London 2012 opening ceremony. Admittedly, I’m not a keen fan of opening ceremonies – I think the money is better spent elsewhere. But the truth is that it didn’t appeal to me.
Don’t get me wrong – the event was not boring for me because it was in any way mis-choreographed (at least the parts I saw). The whole set up was spectacular. There were a number of great parts, such as the forming of the five interlocking Olympic rings and the lighting of the flame. The latter was especially significant because of who lit the flame: not David Beckham as I had hoped but seven promising athletes – even better!
I’m sorry, but I got bored reasonably quickly and I just waited patiently to see the Maltese contingent walk in with the flag for my very own brief moment of pride.
And pride, in a sense, is what it was all about. The only thing is that it was the pride of anyone British or related in some way to Great Britain. If you were in neither of these two groups, it didn’t really work. Well, it didn’t for me.
It’s like watching The Malta Experience – a slide show depicting 7,000 years of Maltese history in 45 minutes or thereabouts. I got a sense of pride whenever I used to watch it. Non-Maltese just learnt about our history – period. Â
If I understood the London 2012 opening ceremony correctly, it was also meant to be a historical re-enactment, with a pinch of salt – hence the inclusion of characters like Rowan Atkinson and the Queen jumping out of a helicopter (sic). And thank God – or the British – for that sense of humour. Which other head of state would so readily be willing to do what the British Queen did?
If I were British, I would be very proud of what the island nation achieved. And the comments on Facebook were testament to that. But I’m not.
I guess it’s comparable to tea – the British appreciate it in a way few do. While tea is great, I’d go for coffee any day.